My Photo

i-mode® Business Newsletter

Search!


My Networks


Contact me now



Read This

« Talent To Burn - An Economics Lesson from the Mocking Bird Izakaya | Main | How Innovation can be built into Outsourcing »

April 03, 2004

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341da0be53ef00d83433589753ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How to Build Your Linkedin Business Network:

Comments

Scott Allen

Walter:

My apologies for not following up sooner after the ZDNet Australia article. I've been heads-down on finishing our book, and let's just say that writing a major book, keeping up with clients, and maintaining timely correspondence are a challenging combination.

I'd love to send you a review copy of our draft manuscript if you're interested. Please drop me an email if you are.

- Scott -

Konstantin Guericke

I'm one of the co-founders of LinkedIn and found your article very refreshing. Most blogs repeat cliches about online networking tools like LinkedIn, but few focus on *how* they can be used most effectively.

And it's all about "how." With hundreds of thousands (900,000 currently) of LinkedIn users, we just did a survey of how professionals use LinkedIn and what their results have been.

The result: some are very savy about building their network, establishing a quality reputation and leveraging the reputation they've earned with their peers and have already amazing results to show. But clearly the majority is not quite sure what to do with it, and a small groups has gone with a quantity over quality approach they learned at open-access sites.

LinkedIn is a tool, so the results vary tremendously depending on who is using it. A hammer makes it easier to build a house, but it is also worth remembering that it requires an arm and a brain to use it well and that it's also possible to injure yourself with it.

But pain from injuries are a good thing, too, since it stimulates learning. To keep things simple (and the KISS principle is important for any good tool), we launched LinkedIn 15 months ago with just one relationship in mind: a very strong one.

After all, you have to be willing to recommend not just the person with whom you are connecting, but also know them well enough to trust their judgment in people they recommend to you.

To keep relationships strong, we built in feedback meachanisms that encourage people to invite their best and most trusted contacts and not just the convenient ones (those who are already signed up). After all, every link will get tested sooner or later if the person asks you for an introduction on their own or a friend's behalf or if you need to make a judgment call on whether or not to forward a contact request to them from one of your contacts. Not knowing both parties well not only leads to awkwardness, but can also damage your reputation by forwarding requests that are not win-win or by not acting on a request and letting your contact see that you are not forwarding theirs. I think a well-reasoned decline is always better for relationships than an ignore (and we designed LinkedIn, so you you can do so anonymously).

And, for example, if the person does not heed your advice to provide more useful info when asking you to introduce their contact or to clearly present the value proposition to the intended recipient, then you can always disconnect. Our customer service now has a system in place the prioritizes dis-connection requests above all others and connections should be cut within hours of requesting them if you contact us during business hours California time.

But we are learning a lot, and LinkedIn has evolved considerably since we launched in May 3003. In the beginning, we did not show how many degrees people were away, we did not even allow your direct connections to see who you know and we only allowed contact by referral. All were designed to provide privacy and very fine filters to satisfy business people who get deluged with people wanting things from them in the real world and who find it intolerable to be on network where they get more of the same. But it made things too opaque. For people to trust the system, we had to open it up a bit more.

Later, we found out that a very small percentage of users went overboard with invitations (quantity over quality approach) because our feedback mechansim above which emulates real-life human behavior takes too long to kick in. Rather than being heavy-handed and directly impose limits on the senders, we added a feature for invitation blocking for those poor souls (VC's, reporters, execs) who are found in the address books of tens of thousands of people because these people met them once and thought LinkedIn would be good way to reach out to them. Now the people who are in the address books of others can control who can invite them based on who they keep in *their* address book.

I'm sure we will be learning more things and evolving the system. After all, people inviting lots of people to LinkedIn is not generally a bad thing. It's just a bad thing for the one and only kind of relationship we currently allow in the system.

Also, having a large group of users and many of them with lots of content on their profiles, we are learning that we are becoming a sort of business people search engine for many where people look up people they are meeting for the first time or even people they know, but whose history they didn't know.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.


  • Subscribe to DI Live! at Bloglines

Recent Reading

March 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

ChannelWeb


i-mode Content Forum


  • i-mode Business Strategy last 5 posts

CIO Insync Buzz


Blog powered by TypePad